Some years ago, Dr. E. Michael Jones was asked on Twitter if he would rather see a Poland which was populated by ethnic Poles who were pagan, or by Catholic Sub-Saharan Africans. Dr. Jones stated that he preferred the latter option, which solicited the expected responses and insults. Of course, this question demands a response far too nuanced than can be answered in accordance with the limitations of Twitter, but regardless Dr. Jones did answer incorrectly. The “Poland” of Dr. Jones would be a country of Catholic Africans who live in eastern Europe. It would not be Poland because that territory would not have any Poles residing within it. Countries are not contingent on religion, they are contingent on the people who reside there and therefore a pagan Poland would still be Poland, whereas African-Poland would not be. But as a Christian, is this not an example of ethnophyletism? Is this not putting ethnos above the Christian faith? I say no. If we are to seriously consider the dilemma placed before us, and if we consider the history of Europe and Poland, then those elements of the Catholic Poland that E. Michael Jones so admires would still exist, undeveloped within a pagan Poland. It was a pagan Poland which converted to Christianity, and would later became a leading world power, rivalling even the Principality of Moscow and eventually Russia. A pagan Poland is still Poland, and can again become the great Catholic power it was before. An Africanized Poland sees the Poles extinct, and their unique expression of Catholicism exterminated. This view is Scriptural, as when we consider God’s relationship with the Hebrews, we see that relationship was contingent on blood/ethnos and not religious faith. When the Hebrews rejected God and apostatized, God would send prophets to the nation so that they may reconvert and return to the true faith. Likewise, I doubt that God would want to see a once devout race like the Poles exterminated and replaced with Africans, and instead would want to see them once again brought into the fold.
Of course, this type of question is a trap. Whatever answer Dr. Jones provided would have resulted in him alienating some of his followers, and furthermore Twitter is not the place where such a question can be fully dissected and answered properly. The dichotomy between Christianity and ethnic interests has always been divisive within rightest movements. The universalism of Christianity is presented by some race ideologues as naturally antagonist to nationalism, and that by being a Christian we must turn a blind eye to ethnic or national interests and subordinate them to a Christian form of multiculturalism and globalism. I never really saw Christianity and nationalism at odds, as I believe each ethnicity is biologically distinct and that these distinctions shape culture, religious expression, and how the group understands/conceptualizes God. Therefore, as a nationalist, I would want every nationality to reside within their own lands so that their cultural and religious expressions could develop and reach their natural apex without being influenced or polluted by foreign expressions. And of course, there will always be some degree of mingling, be it cultural, religious, or with miscegenation, but until recently these cases have always been in the absolute minority, and did not threaten ethnic, religious, or cultural cohesion at a time before nationalism was even a codified ideology. If people groups are not incentivized or forced to integrate, they will naturally seek to situate themselves amongst their own people, and then people like themselves.
As such, by serving and advocating the interests of my ethnicity, and then my race, I am advocating for Christian interests, and this cannot be argued against unless you believe that western/Anglo Orthodoxy is something which should not exist and instead should be replaced with a generic Orthodoxy which ignores the identity, culture, and spiritual needs of white English speakers. As I would not condemn the existence of Black Orthodox movements, such as the St. Moses the Black Society, neither will I condemn the Phillip Ludwell III Orthodox Fellowship. In a perfect world, North America would be more homogeneous. I believe that diversity is a fundamental weakness, one which in the short time may appear to provide benefit but will ultimately result in the dissolution of a country. Yet the diversity we experience is self-imposed. Yes of course Jewish interests have pushed for diversity and the ethnic disintegration of America, but the goyim have eagerly bought into and embraced what the merchant has sold to them. So again, much of the blame rests on our shoulders, and the immigrant black, Indian, Arab, etc. are blameless in their coming here. They are also blameless in their failure to assimilate and in their rejection of western values, as our states do not enforce assimilation and most “western values” I would not wish imposed on myself. But still, these coloured masses are being used to undermine the ethnic, cultural, and religious makeup of my country, and by extension act as an enemy even if they do not intend to be. We do not live in a world where I can snap my fingers and return North America, or in my case specifically Canada, to the demographics of 1901, and neither can I convert all of the diverse masses to Orthodoxy. We are presented with the worst of both worlds, with our only hope being the ultimate decline and destruction of the states which rule us.
I still do not think that we should hope for the destruction of our countries or states. I think that it will be needful, but I do not look forward to these events, events which could very likely not occur in my lifetime. But regardless, even though diversity acts as and is in itself an enemy, individuals who comprise that diversity are blameless. People as individuals are not my enemy, and diversity is my enemy in the same sense that as an Orthodox Christian, Catholics and Protestants would be my enemies in that they are working against Orthodox interests. Whereas Protestant and Catholic institutions work against Orthodox institutions, and sometimes overtly oppose them, most individual Catholic and Protestant adherents are not concerned with Orthodoxy, and thus they have limited culpability. This is the same with diversity. Diversity is the enemy, and although individuals may be counted in that contingent, they individually are blameless and thus attacking the individual is both fruitless and immoral. Self-defence is permitted, but a proactive assault cannot be justified because the existence of the other is not in itself an offence. We may dislike the particular other for reasons justified, unjustified, personal, or collective, but this dislike does not justify maltreatment or assault. Lashing out against individual representatives of diversity or ethnic replacements does nothing to motivate policy changes we would favour, and will most likely result in our elites hastening our demographic decline.
Payton Gendron is a reprehensible fool. Nothing positive has or will come from his actions, and he deserves to be executed. Now of course, murder is always wrong, and as such I did not feel the need to go over the reasons why that is so in this article. I condemn murder and assault for moral reasons, but I can understand how some people may fall into despair and hopelessness and see violence as their only recourse. I can understand these feelings, but I cannot of course condone them. Gendron is a fool who, with his attack, has accomplished nothing. White Americans see him as a terrorist, his unhinged manifesto portrays people who have similar views to him as potential terrorists, and now the system has been given further justification to assault civil liberties and hasten the decline of white demographics. The system can now add Gendron’s name beside Dylann Roof and James Alex Fields Jr. as an example of far-right white nationalist terrorists, and of course we are made to conveniently forget the names of Darrell Edward Brooks Jr., Matthew Harris, and Frank James. Whereas Gendron will be invoked perennially by the left to support and justify their policies, these black racists will be forgotten. I guess one positive aspect of these types of attacks is that they show that disenfranchisement with multiculturalism and diversity is not confined to a single ethnic or racial group. I only wish that this disenfranchisement could give voice to rational actors and not to those who in most cases are mentally disturbed.
To conclude, the enemy we face is not the individual non-white or non-Christian, but it is the system which enables such people to enter into our countries and exert power and influence over our culture and society. The system that has morally corrupted us, destroyed our demographics, and encouraged degeneracy will also do the same to the Africans, Indians, and Arabs who live amongst us, and thus they, like us, should despise this system. Alas, where they have homelands to which they can flee after having exploited western wealth, we do not, and in the short time they act and exist as antagonists. Not wilfully so (at least the majority), but antagonists/enemies because they are being used by our enemies to serve their goals and not our own. Those who rule over us see people as fungible matter that they can use and exploit to their ends, and thus demonizing or harming the other serves no purpose because to the elite, they will always have a ready supply of new people to make up for losses. The elite’s hatred of humanity is universal, even as they may have a particular disdain for white people at this time. Now, this is not my attempt at advocating for a diverse coalition of based minorities to fight against multiculturalism. The diversity is sustained and currently benefits from the existing system, and even though one might think they could be our natural allies, in reality they need and are indebted to the system. They may not be intentional or willing enemies, but they still act as enemies in alliance with the system and as such our interests differ. Our interests lie with our own people, and theirs with their own, and just as I will not dictate what is in the interest of the other, I would expect them not to dictate what is in my interest or in the interest of my people. For more on this subject, I would recommend this earlier article of mine.
If you are able to donate I would welcome your support on Patreon or via the crypto wallets below: https://www.patreon.com/godkingandnation
Bitcoin: bc1q3q8qaff3d2zllj3yx7jtszrs349xv4av2r8mg3
Ethererum: 0x072E4EE9268AfAA436A8f4BBdAF775b28007eCD4
I would like to thank FeedSpot for adding God, King, and Nation to their list of the top 80 Orthodox blogs. FeedSpot’s list can be found here: https://blog.feedspot.com/orthodox_blogs/
God, King, and Nation 